The Authoritative Source for Plumbing, Hydronics, Fire Protection and PVF

Designer's Guide

When enough is enough

By Timothy Allinson, P.E.,
Murray Co., Long Beach, Calif.

In recent months, I have been reading a host of articles and getting industry feedback that suggests to me that our industry is in a real state of flux and, possibly, headed in the wrong direction. Of course, you have to take what you read with a grain of salt, but some of the feedback I have received has been first-hand personal accounts of horrific plumbing installations that just want to make me say, “Enough is enough!”


For example, I recently received an email from the facilities director of a Los Angeles area university complaining about his oversized grease interceptor. It seems he read a past article of mine on this subject, and he wanted to know whether there was anything he could do to correct the problems associated with his grease interceptor. Back in 2002, he had a 5,000 gallon unit installed to serve his new dining facility; since then, there have been regular complaints of foul odors. Further, when he has the unit pumped out, it takes 11 days of normal operation for the unit to fill up and start producing effluent to the sewer. He also had a hydrogen sulfide detector installed on the grease interceptor vent, and it regularly registers high levels of H2S. Clearly, this guy has done his homework.


After explaining the grease interceptor UPC Code changes that occurred in 2006, I told this gentleman that he could replace his 5,000 gallon unit with a 1,500 gallon unit. This delighted him, since it would definitely make his maintenance easier and probably resolve, or at least mitigate the odor problems and reduce the likelihood of H2S gas. We are presently working with him to change out his interceptor — a change that should never have been necessary had our Code been stronger in 2002.


Shortly after having the email exchange referenced above, I read about another interesting plumbing development. It seems that hands free sensor faucets are now considered health hazards; at least that’s what doctors at Johns Hopkins Health Systems have claimed. They shared a study in April that claims that 50% of the water samples taken from 20 sensor faucets contained Legionella, compared with 15% of the samples taken from 20 manual faucets. Further, 26% of the sensor faucets had higher levels of other bacteria, versus 13% of the manual faucets.


The manner in which this study was conducted makes me wonder about its validity. Flow rates, aerators, pipe supply configuration and hardware all need to be taken into consideration when comparing one faucet with another. Since doctors know little about plumbing (except the human kind), the study may have been flawed from a technical standpoint. In fact, other studies have found just the opposite, that manual faucets contained more bacteria than sensors. It could be that the problem is associated more with the flow rate of the faucet than with its method of operation. Reduced water flows are great for saving water — an important priority — but they are starting to produce unintended consequences, and Legionella could be one of those consequences.


Aside from not properly flushing Legionella from the plumbing system, low-flow faucets and their UHE (Ultra High Efficiency) water closet and urinal counterparts are contributing to dry drains and clogged sewers around the country.


Dry drains, for those unfamiliar with the term, are drain lines that don’t have enough flow to carry solid waste along their length. UHE fixtures are contributing to this phenomenon, since products are changing faster than the industry codes. For example, I have read that a 1.6 gpf toilet has a 45-foot carry distance compared with 29 feet for a 1.28 gpf toilet. In high-rise buildings with limited horizontal pipe (except at the base, where flow rates would be considerably greater), this is not a problem. But in low-rise buildings, with long horizontal runs and limited fixture loading, get ready for blockages.


Meanwhile, in some cities, such as San Francisco, water conservation has reportedly led to municipal sewer odors and blockages. In SF the problem is so bad that they have scripted a $14 million, three-year contract to purchase 27 million pounds of bleach to dump into the city’s sewers. But San Francisco has combined sanitary and storm sewers, so now there is a pending lawsuit from the Heal the Bay Foundation for polluting the Bay Area waterways with bleach. I’ll say it again: Enough is enough.


Next is the subject of waterless urinals. Again, I am all in favor of saving water, but I have read test reports and seen photos of pipes that were completely blocked with uric acid crystals after 39 months of use, and this was in glass pipe. One would expect the crystals to collect faster in cast iron, due to its rougher wall surface. The same test found that the waterless urinals performed much better when the lavatories were piped upstream of the urinals, which act to flush the urinal drain line, so perhaps that is a necessary code revision where waterless urinals are installed.


Another concern about water conservation is the scald potential associated with low flow showerheads. Many people are trying to do the right thing by putting low flow showerheads on their showers, without confirming that their shower valve will perform properly at the reduced flow; many won’t, especially older models. In many cases the user would be better off just turning off the shower while they soap up rather than reducing the flow of the showerhead, which increases shower duration and, possibly, creates a scald hazard.


The greatest frustration of these water conservation efforts is that, reportedly, 87% of the nation’s potable water use is for industrial purposes and 13% is for residential. Of that, 5% is for outdoor use and 8% for indoor consumption. Of the 8%, only 2.4% is used to flush toilets, so if all toilet flush volumes were reduced by 50% that would only save 1.2% of all domestic water usage, while industry continues to use over 87%. So as the tail wags the dog, our industry, clients and the public in general are enduring ever increasing heartache over drain line and sewer blockages for the sake of saving a relatively insignificant amount of water. That’s not to say that I am not in favor of saving water wherever possible, but the codes have to be changed before the ramifications of water conservation create the very health hazards that modern day plumbing is supposed to avoid.


For example, here in California, the Green Building Standards Code went into effect at the beginning of this year. This code mandates a 20% water reduction for both residential and non-residential construction. However, the code does nothing to address the impact of that requirement on the plumbing systems. Hence, there is no benefit from reduced pipe sizing to save money on the plumbing installation. If drainage lines serving water closets were reduced in size, and if the sanitary pipe material were changed to smooth plastic, the drain line carry would be greater and the installation less expensive.
In fairness, there are committees working on corrective code measures to address these very issues, but the code change process is an arduous one that takes many more years to achieve than the arbitrary reduction in fixture flows mandated by the 20% savings. “Politicized science” is and will remain far ahead of the true science that struggles to keep pace. An industry coalition called PERC, the Plumbing Efficiency Research Coalition, is trying to address the issues created by water conservation through field studies, laboratory tests and computer models, but, in this financial climate, the monies available are insufficient for PERC to work as quickly and effectively as politicized science would demand.

Timothy Allinson is a senior professional engineer with Murray Co., Mechanical Contractors, in Long Beach, Calif. He holds a bsme from Tufts University and an mba from New York University. He is a professional engineer licensed in both mechanical and fire protection engineering in various states, and is a leed accredited professional. Allinson is a past-president of aspe, both the New York and Orange County Chapters. He can be reached at laguna_tim@yahoo.com.